Ɂehdzo Got’ı̨nę Gots’ę́ Nákedı
Sahtú Renewable Resources Board

Sahtu Atlas Quick Menu

Environmental Assessments

An important lever held by the Board is its ability to recommend that an application be referred to the Mackenzie Valley Review Board for environmental assessment. The Board carefully considers many factors prior to calling for an environmental assessment, including:

  • Could the proposed project push impacts over a critical wildlife threshold?
  • Does the proposed method raise concerns?
  • Could the conditions imposed set an important precedent for future projects?
  • Has the proponent shown willingness to address community concerns and participate in a formal, ongoing adaptive management system?

Industry/Wildlife

Shale Oil Exploration in the Sahtú

The Sahtú has experienced an exploration boom since 15 shale oil leases were awarded in 2011 and 2012 and 2013. There has been a lot of concern about impacts to wildlife and wildlife habitat. The exploration boom has highlighted the Board’s responsibility to provide meaningful input in environmental assessments.

When licensing and permitting applications are submitted and deemed complete, the Sahtú Land and Water Board (SLWB) has 42 days to make a decision on whether to issue a permit/license or request more information. The Board must be prepared to respond quickly and with the best available knowledge. Our knowledge comes from expert consultants in traditional knowledge and science.

Last fall the Board commissioned a report entitled Role of the SRRB in Environmental Assessment: Reflections and Recommendations. The report analyzed how the Board can best respond to industry applications.

The Board works to provide specific recommendations related to our mandate in wildlife management. It is important that these can be enforced through terms and conditions of the program. For example, the Board might recommend alternate routes or alternate methods to do the work that have less impact on wildlife and wildlife habitat. They might recommend using “best practices” that have been demonstrated elsewhere.

Making a Difference

The Board has made a difference with some of our recommendations and suggestions over the past year. Here are some examples:

  • Increased sampling frequency in groundwater and surface water monitoring plan.
  • Use of tracers in fracking fluids, which would be traced back to fracking fluids in case of any groundwater contamination.
  • Use of the Alberta Environment Standard for Baseline Water Testing for Coalbed Methane operations in the groundwater and surface water monitoring plans.

 

How we Fit into the Big Picture

The Board is only one of many organisations and individuals that provide comments on development applications. Each of these bodies has their own expertise and focus in providing comments:

  • NWT Environment and Natural Resources
  • Environment Canada
  • National Energy Board
  • AANDC (Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada)
  • Ɂehdzo Got’ı̨nę (Renewable Resources Councils)

The Board seeks to add value to the pool of comments. Our mandate is huge, since responsibility for wildlife also includes their habitat, the land and water that they depend on to survive. As a co-management board, we have a unique combination of traditional knowledge and science to draw upon.

The Board is in the process of developing a guide outlining industry best practices in reducing development impacts on wildlife and wildlife habitat. We want to help make this shale oil play a model of wise planning and decision-making so that wildlife will remain healthy in this region for many generations to come.